Click The Box At The Top Right For More Pages
Expose Scientific-Religious-Educational Corruption
Science and by default education became totally political in the 1930’s, corrupted by politicians who were corrupted by oligarchy capitalists.
The true purpose of science: To support the global monetary status quo. To serve as a pseudo-religion for those disillusioned by nefarious religions.
The mission of science: Educational confusion: To make you feel inadequate and stupid compared to the mythical heroes of science. Whilst at the same time making you feel brilliant after learning the ‘facts’- the words of the manufactured heroes. These facts actually dumb you down by discouraging independent thinking, as students tend to repeat the teaching of scientific heroes rather than think for themselves. Mesmeric control is reinforced and ensured with a qualification based on this same teaching, a requirement for a job.
The true mission of religion: to make you feel inadequate, guilty and sinful compared to its mythical heroes and then offer you redemption and eternal life that you don’t deserve – if you submit to mind control.
Not so different if you think about it? There are alternatives.
The intent of this page is not to discourage those who desire education, but to inform the educated that they may use the knowledge rather than be used. Education becomes less complex if you know what’s going-on.
Capitalism is corrupt
By its very nature capitalism becomes ever more corrupt and corrupting. Science, religion, education, the legal system and the establishment media are all corrupted by capitalism and are totally unreliable sources of information. We must of course not forget the monetary system and banking itself that has been deliberately corrupted and manipulated in favour of the super-rich.
alixus 
Question everything? No one has time to question everything. At best we only have a little time to research a few important issues, if we have the intellectual capacity and training to tackle them.
Should I take this drug the doctor prescribed? Is it safe and effective? What about rapacious drug companies? We have some experts at the FDA who supervised clinical trials of new drugs and tell us if they are safe and effective enough to take under the guidance of a doctor or over the counter. Both drug companies and activists complain equally loudly about the FDA, so perhaps the get things about right. About right is not perfect. Problems are discovered later with some drugs. The important question is whether your personal research will produce a better answer than the FDA and your doctor provide? If you don’t have the time to personally investigate and the background to understand clinical trials, then don’t waste your time investigating. Read the info they provide and call your doctor if something listed happens to you.
What should you question? How about this blog, that tells you that “Any ‘new’ technology that has appeared since the 1930’s can commonly be traced back to a much earlier date. Everything “new” we have today is a miniaturised remix of pre-existing, pre 1930’s, old technology.”
Lasers? Transistors? Integrated circuits? Fiber optic cable? LEDs and LED light bulbs. Just about every medicine used today? What was life expectancy in 1930? We didn’t know about DNA in 1930. Now we have genetic engineering, therapeutic protein drugs, GMO crops.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi BS Detector,
Thank you for the reply, I always welcome criticism. I try to find the kind of information you don’t get in training. It’s there for those who don’t get the time.
I tend not to do health matters because of the emotion involved, but I have added one or two of late… a work in progress.
The 1930’s watershed was a deliberate ploy on the part of the oligarchs of the day to ensure they continued making boat-loads of money from energy production. They threatened to withdraw the funding of organisations who’s scientists were working on highly efficient energy supplies. This is documented if you care to do some research or alternatively you could read some of the pages on my site. Tesla is the only one we hear of today, but it applied to all scientists.
J.J. Thomson was involved in such work, as were O Heaviside, JC Maxwell, W Crookes & CP Steinmetz, basically all the top men in electronics. None of them wanted the electron and said so.
BTW J.J.Thomson was bribed with the Nobel Prize.
“Any ‘new’ technology that has appeared since the 1930’s can commonly be traced back to a much earlier date. Everything “new” we have today is a miniaturised remix of pre-existing, pre 1930’s, old technology.”
When Thomson “discovered the electron” he had all the circuitry and components we have today and come the transistor they all worked perfectly well.
The transistor was in use in Marconi ship-board wireless during the first decade of the 1900’s. It’s been around as long as radio. If you go to the link you will see that a transistor radio was built in the 1930’s. https://nextexx.com/undeserved-nobel-prizes-transistor/
I’ve traced integrated circuits back to 1903: https://nextexx.com/science-stole-the-computer-part-3/
Fibre optics have been around since Roman times.
The LED goes way back to before 1900.
I will have to concede the laser because it’s history is so confused due to Einstein.
The billion dollar human DNA project was a total failure having failed to predict the most basic human characteristics like height. It is now admitted that DNA does not contain all the required information.
cadxx
LikeLike
Dear CADXX,
Damn pleased to make your acquaintance, I wish there were more people like you on this planet, then I wouldn’t feel so alone.
It’s a grueling experience to realize that the only reason I don’t own a hover-board today, is because the majority says I can’t. It’s even more grueling to realize that I will _never_ own a hover-board, because it is our nature to obstruct things we can’t or won’t fathom.
I present to you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
Oh, the Humanity! – We are all doomed… unless…
LikeLike
Pleased to meet you Geoffrey
Hope you get your hover-board
regards
LikeLike
I will have to make my own hover-board, but I really don’t have time waiting for people to die around me, as Max Planck said: “A scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
Anyway, I have something “scientific” I would like to discuss with a peer, but since I don’t know any… would you be my peer for the purpose of this discussion? I know it’s a weird request, but try humor me.
Please contact me on this disposable mail address: g.omondi@outlook.com this address will be deleted in two weeks from today.
LikeLike
Hi Geoffrey
Thank you for the interest and the request. It has only been just over a week since someone using WordPress hacked my computer and inserted a large number of hidden files into my Doc’s folder, whilst also making it impossible for me to post a page on my own website. I don’t lose any sleep over this as it’s been happening for years. What it tells me is that I’m doing a good job – rattling the pea size brain in the head of a hacker who thinks he is a genius. I usually find that such people are of low intelligence and tend to be paid-up members of some pseudo-sKeptical organisation who do their thinking for them. Basically they are slaves to a medieval monk mentality, copying and worshipping academic science as scripture and as a religion.
And so sadly I must decline your request for security reasons. Everything I know about science is posted on my website. May I suggest you use the search facility?
Regards
LikeLike
Let me try to rephrase, maybe I did not express myself properly since English is not my native tongue.
I need a peer to do a peer review of a short and simple theory I have, and I feel sincerely that you could be my peer (consider this a compliment). I really need to hear constructive criticism from another thinking person.
Please reconsider your position. I do not need to know your identity, I already know you as a human being by reading your blog, which is sufficient for me. So whatever security concerns you might have, I’m confident we can address them.
Comments:
“someone using WordPress hacked my computer” – If it’s any comfort, it’s not a professional job, it’s just some script kiddies.
“What it tells me is that I’m doing a good job” – If you define a “good job” as provoking some teens, then yes, but what’s the purpose? How will you change/rattle anyones beliefs when you are up against the almighty confirmation bias?
“Everything I know about science is posted on my website.” – In general I feel the same as you about the subjects you have covered in your blog, but I want to break new ground and therefore more interested in your valuable thinking and reasoning about the subject that I have in mind.
You can consider my request as an opportunity to do something proactive, walk the walk and help me out of here, be a brother.
And me? Yes, I want to change the world or die trying.
LikeLike
Hi again Geoffrey
If you have anything important to say just post it here. If I think it’s good, if I think it’s a world changer, I will make a new page and post it on my website with your name on it. That is the best I can do.
You do realise that your post rings all of the alarm bells?
Regards
LikeLike
“You do realise that your post rings all of the alarm bells?”
Depends on which alarm bells you are hearing. If it’s because I come over as weird moron, then I realize that, if it’s something else – then no.
“If you have anything important to say just post it here.” – I have nothing to say that would be of interest to the public.
“That is the best I can do.” – I’m sad to hear that.
LikeLike
I just wanted to leave this with you, it is not my intention to offend you in any way. And if you don’t mind I will return to your blog to read some more interesting stuff, and I do like your writing style regardless. I will refrain from commenting further, somehow I get the feeling that it would not be welcomed.
I (as a stranger to you) have approached you with a genuine request for help, which you have declined with a security reason, I completely understand and accept that.
Now, a security reason is caused by a fear of something, and I do not see what I have said and done that could induce fear in you, so the only remaining reason is the primordial fear that nature has bestowed upon us.
Some humans have courage, meaning that they posses the ability to embrace their primordial fear and act against it. Courage is the precursor of progress, intelligence is not – intelligence is heavily overrated these days, it only serves a purpose if there is courage.
Someone actually bothered to make a motion picture on the very same subject, here is the executive summary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwZ0ZUy7P3E
As Homér would say “It’s funny because it’s true”
LikeLiked by 1 person